Thursday, March 1, 2012

Rhetoric of SEAL Team 6



Earlier this week I read an account of the killing of Bin Laden by the commander of the SEAL Team 6. The main reason why the commander released his own account was because he felt that the description of the event as released to the public by politicians was very different from how it actually occurred. SEAL Team 6 felt that the politicians had portrayed them as a kill squad, and as one of the SEALs stated, “I’ve been a Seal for 30 years and I never heard the words ‘kill mission’,” he said. “It’s a Beltway [Washington insider’s] fantasy word. If it was a kill mission you don’t need SEAL Team 6; you need a box of hand grenades.”
            In addition to being angry that they had been labeled as a kill team, SEAL Team 6 was also upset that all of the intelligence they had gathered at the Bin Laden compound was rendered irrelevant when President Obama went on national TV to declare his death. All other high-officials of the al-Qaeda network would have immediately left their hiding places for new ones. Any potential leads that the team had acquired at the compound to capture these criminals immediately became useless as a result of the President’s public announcement. The Team felt that the public announcement should have been held off for a couple of days for other branches of the military to attempt to pursue those lead developed at the compound. Unfortunately, instead it became a political game of who could claim credit for the kill first.
The SEAL account raises the question, why did the politicians on Capitol Hill do what they did in releasing the information prematurely if they knew it wasn’t in the best interest of the country? Why would they label the team as killers, when in fact the only people to die were the ones who pointed guns at the SEALs? The truth is that all of the politicians on Capitol Hill are solely looking out for their own political careers. They don’t care about who gets hit in the crossfire so long as they come out looking like victors. Their primary concern is their own reputation and electability. The only reason that President Obama went on the air was to be glorified as the President that killed Obama. He didn’t want anyone else to deliver the news, even if there was a possibility to completely unhinge the al-Qaeda network. Although this posturing is a shame, it should only be expected as business as usual in Washington.

2 comments:

  1. This is really interesting dude. I thank you for sharing it. Maybe I'm a little biased, or just more well educated on the issue than some, but I never really saw until now how much the public perceived them as a "kill squad." I certainly understand where the commander is coming from and that that would be very upsetting. In the several months after it was released that SEAL Team 6 did the job, some networks (like History and Discovery Channel) did some specials on them which, while obviously not 100% accurate, were at least successful in shedding some light. Also, as a side note, I think it's interesting that they used actual SEALs in the new movie Act of Valor.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is really interesting. The war in Iraq has become a game to see who can come out as the victor in capitol hill not in the actually war. The fact that Obama ruined the chance of capturing more of the terrorist cell is inexcusable. He is the commander-in-chief and should have handled the situation as such. I think its really great that the SEAL's team issued their own statement.

    ReplyDelete